Meat Ads that Use Anthropomorphized Animals / “Turkey Day”

I absolutely despise it when commercials that are advertising meat use talking animals to promote their product. It is bad enough that the poor animals being murdered so that people can not only eat to survive, but rather to enjoy a treat. It is bad enough that the commercials glorify killing and eating animals (I can’t stand the ones that show sizzling chunks of dead animal flesh, trying to make it look appealing), but to actually use them in the commercials is just wrong. It is immoral and indecent and often encroaches on cannibalism.

The steak-sauce commercial that has a cow singing to lure you into eating it is sick. The commercial showing cows and chickens trying to convince humans to eat the other is disgusting. And the rest…

In a similar vein, I really hate it when people call Thanksgiving “Turkey Day”. First of all, it masks and dismisses the whole point of Thanksgiving which is to recognize the good in your life and that others are not so lucky, and to be grateful for what you have and to help others. Second, it is even more disrespectful to the turkeys who die on the day. It is bad enough they are dying, but to give the day a “cutesy” name like that makes light of and demeans their deaths.

Everything is #1! Yeah right.

I am so sick of every network and channel constantly calling everything The season’s #1 show, Canada’s favorite new show, The best show on television, The biggest hit on TV, The new #1 hit, and so on. These claims are b.s. for at least two reasons:

  • Don’t tell me what is a good show or not! I’ll decide for myself whether a show is any good and I hate being told by others that something is good, particularly when I already know it is not! I can’t count the number of times I have seen a commercial for a show I hate being called #1. That is incredibly aggravating.
  • How many #1/favorite shows are there‽ How can every show be #1 or the favorite? How can every new show be a hit? The claims they make are statistically and logically ridiculous and garbage.

America and Metric

It aggravates the hell out of me that America eschews the Metric system for several reasons:

  • The Metric system, while not perfect, is vastly superior to and much simpler than the Imperial system that America uses. It is consistent with equal intervals of 10 instead of random ones, which makes it easy to memorize. It uses decimal units (intervals of 10) which makes it easy to use by multiplying or dividing to make larger or smaller units.
  • America always makes such a big deal about how they revolted against the British and abjured their ways, and yet they keep using the Imperial system which, you guessed it, is British!
  • Every other country in the world has had the brains to switch to Metric except for the United States and a couple of third-world countries.

CDRWin Vigilantism

Something that I have been wanting to complain about for a long time is CDRWin from Golden Hawk. Back in the days when CDs were still common (and most piracy was with CDs), burning CD images to blank CDs was a task that some people did often. There were plenty of programs and image formats, but CDRWin was a popular one that worked fairly well, at least that is, until version 4.0.

To deter piracy (which is of course a Sisyphean endeavor), Golden Hawk chose not to increase the complexity of their licensing system, but rather, to play vigilante and sabotage users’ system when they suspected an attempt at piracy.

What happened was CDRWin basically had three modes of operation:

  • Unregistered/evaluation
  • Registered
  • Vigilante

When you enter a serial-number/key to register CDRWin, if the key is invalid, then it will complain and remain in evaluation mode. However, if the key is valid, then it may accept the key and say thank you and display a Registered stamp in the titlebar and About dialog, but secretly be in vigilante mode whereby it pretends to be registered and appears to be in all manner, except that whenever you burn a disc, it corrupts it, resulting in a “coaster”.

This is unacceptable for several reasons

  1. The method that it uses to detect if the key was created using a “key generator” instead of from Golden Hawk themselves seems to be flawed because legitimate customers were incorrectly affected.
  2. The surreptitious nature of the anti-piracy tactic (it gives not warning whatsoever) prevented identifying the problem and made it look like the software is simply buggy, thus damaging the developer’s general reputation (imagine that, reviews from pirates having a big impact on sales!)
  3. This is essentially vigilante behavior, not anti-piracy techniques. If vigilantism is illegal in the real world, why would it be acceptable in the digital one?
  4. The sabotage it does is actively harmful to the user. By corrupting (apparently all) discs that are burned with the software, they are causing the user to have to throw them out because they are now useless. Would it be any more acceptable if the software were designed to fry a user’s CPU, burn out their monitor, or print hundreds of pages of solid black/color with their printer to waste their ink cartridges? Of course not! Wasting blank CDs isn’t any more acceptable.

Valve is Destroying the Game Industry

Valve is single-handedly leading the way to the ruination of the game industry.

One of (if not the) primary function of their Steam platform was to prevent, or at least reduce, software piracy of video-games. However, not surprisingly, Steam did little to reduce piracy and a different function ended up gaining a lot of momentum and is destroying video-games.

A big selling point of Steam is that developers can get their games out to users faster and easier and release patches and updates to users faster and easier. While this seems like a good thing, it is actually hugely detrimental.

In the old days of programming, you had to spend time designing your software, then more time writing it, then testing and debugging it until it was as good as possible. Then you would release it to manufacturing to be written to disks/discs, shipped to stores, and sold to customers. The users would then use it, and sometimes find problems or shortcomings. Developers would then gather these reports and requests and roll them up into an update or full upgrade and repeat. This would happen once in a while and would make it worthwhile to upgrade to a newer version because there were a lot of fixes, changes, and enhancements. (The same was true for hardware.)

Now look at how things are today with Steam. Developers write a half-baked game with a massive quantity of bugs and missing features, then rush it out the “door” (i.e., publish it to Steam) to get it to gamers as fast as possible. They have no qualms about doing this because they can just fix/complete the game after release by posting bug fixes every few days to Steam and releasing the features they cut to get it out fast as “downloadable content” (often for more money).

This is terrible programming practice. Not only does it encourage sloppy, lazy programming, but it costs the users tremendously. Users frequently have to keep paying for things that should have been included, they have to constantly use monumental amounts of their own bandwidth to get patches that seem to grow ever larger (don’t even get me started on the unacceptably large size of games these days), and the actual quality of the games (in all areas) just keeps going down.

Another horrible consequence of Steam is a part of its anti-piracy mechanisms. It requires an Internet connection to let you play most of the time which of course is undesirable, but because of this design, it means that they perform a server check on the game license. While the server check can (and has) be hacked, it means that you cannot buy or sell used games. In the old days, you could sell your old games (whether to buy new games, buy your children winter clothing, or to pay for your mother’s surgery). You could also buy used games for cheap if you could not afford them when they were new and expensive. Now, however, you have to create a Steam account to activate the game (even if you bought it on DVD), and the game then gets locked to that account, so you cannot buy or sell them. This is absolutely unacceptable in every way.

Imagine if Ford designed their cars and titles such that you were not allowed to sell or even give your car away. You would be stuck with it forever and never able to buy a used car, which means that anyone who is not rich would be locked out forever.

Just because they made Half-Life does not make them good. Valve is bad and is destroying the game industry. Users need to stop supporting Valve and Steam. Unfortunately, that will not happen. People may be angry and may even intend to boycott stuff, but the truth is that they won’t; the ones that can afford new games, will just buy them when they come out no matter how mad they may be.

Get Lost Facebook and Twitter!

Friggin’ social networks!

I have social-anxiety disorder, so I have NO interest in any kind of social garbage, yet Facebook constantly emails me with notices about this and that social crap. It keeps telling me that I may know this or that person even though I have yet to know even a single one of its suggestions (the worst and stupidest thing is when you create a new account with absolutely no information in it and Facebook—and Twitter—immediately start to make presumptuous suggestions about who they think you might know or like).

How can I tell Facebook to piss the hell off and leave me the hell alone?

No option to decline friend requests anymore? Only Yes and Not Now? What the hell is that, forcing people to be “friends”?

Twitter is no better, constantly emailing me to check out feeds of people I have nothing to do with nor any interest in.

Both networks have an option to disable that specific notification at the bottom of the emails, but this means two things:

  • Opting out of the notification only affects that specific type of notification and has no effect on others, so you will continue to receive those (“legitimate” spammers use this sort of trick by letting you unsubscribe from that specific message which means nothing for other, future messages)
  • They automatically opt you in for everything and force you to manually look through the endless list of notifications and manually opt out of anything/everything instead of opting you into only the most important things automatically and letting you choose to add more notifications like a proper site should

Stupid social networks; SHUT UP and behave!

Who Said Life Was Fair?

I am so sick and tired of hearing people respond to unfair circumstances with the trite line Who said life was fair?

Um, everyone! As you grow up, everybody from teachers, to parents, to television and movies tell children that life is fair and just and that the good guys win and that if you work and study hard, you can get a good job and money, a car, a house and a great life.

It isn’t until it is far too late that you realize they are all full of crap.

“Asian” Semantic Hypocrisy

I had written on this before, but today I noticed that the Asian People page on Wikipedia has a not-worldwide-view flag, which I agree with because the article definitely has the tone of being predominantly written by an American.

The term Oriental is all but taboo in North America as somehow being offensive because it is Eurocentric, yet the same people who eschew it find nothing wrong with saying Middle-East. (One would think this attitude by Americans of obsequiousness to Orientals and abasing Middle-Easterners would make sense given the political climate and international relations, however as the article stated, the conference took place in 1968, long before either the U.S.’ insurmountable debt to China or its ablating relations with the Middle-East.)

That hypocrisy has always irritated me, especially since in North America, the term Asian is used pretty much exclusively to refer to the Far-East (which I suppose is, or at least should be as “offensive” as Oriental). This co-opting of the term that should refer to anyone from the largest continent on the world by one half of it (no matter how many people may be packed into it) is more offensive than any Eurocentricity since it is basically an affront to people from dozens of countries across the rest of the continent.

(Of course, I grew up and learned the names of the continents before the explosion of over-political-correctness that infected North America later on. Aside from the hypocrisy, personally I like the term Oriental because it has that exciting air of mystery whereas Asian is so bland.)

Google’s Moog Synthesizer Doodle Killed My Laptop!

Last night I was using our family laptop. I Googled something and noticed the Moog Synthesizer “Google Doodle”. It was amusing and I played it with it for a few seconds. I fiddled with some of the switches and pressed some of the keys, listening to the awful resulting noises. I fiddled with a few more switches (not having a clue what I was doing since it had no documentation) and clicked one of the keys. I heard a loud, high-pitched popping sound that jolted me and I freaked out because I thought that something in our still-new (four-months old) laptop had burst.

I listened and smelled for any warnings signs and found none. I clicked a few more keys on the doodle keyboard and found my fear realized: there was no sound. I opened the Windows Run dialog and pressed Alt+A (a quick, easy, and reliable way I always use to test sound) and heard nothing. I ran a game I had just been playing and again heard nothing.

The Google doodle had blown the little speaker in our laptop.

Then Check it Yourself!

There was a news report today about how there are no mandated checks on importing human ova.

The report compared it to importing of chicken eggs and how there are strict standards and requirements to bring in eggs from other countries, but that human eggs can be brought in without having to pass any sort of examinations or testing. It also compared it to human sperm which requires testing for diseases and such before being allowed to be imported.

The general tone of the report was that of bewildered outrage and concert as well as an implication that it should be required that human ova pass tests to be imported. Unfortunately the report is completely misplaced. The testing should be incumbent on the recipient, not the sender. If you are concerned about transplant parts being diseased or otherwise no good, then why not just have the recipient do the testing and simply “chuck it out” if it’s not up to par? If you were going to be receiving a transplant of questionable origin, then would you not test it yourself, or would you just trust their word that it’s good?

When you bring old junk into a pawn-shop, you can swear that the item is not fake and that you did research and had it authenticated until you’re blue in the face, but the pawn-shop owner will still do their own testing. How in the world are body parts any less important that the recipient wouldn’t bother to test for themselves?

The only rational reason for requiring the donating parties do the testing is if the recipient is unable to do the testing, but for most transplantable parts, this is not an issue.