{"id":159,"date":"2012-03-24T19:45:55","date_gmt":"2012-03-25T00:45:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/?p=159"},"modified":"2025-02-13T16:40:45","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T21:40:45","slug":"rogers-bandwidth-fraud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/2012\/03\/24\/rogers-bandwidth-fraud\/","title":{"rendered":"Rogers\u2019 Continuing Bandwidth\/Overage Charge and other Frauds"},"content":{"rendered":"
\nI strongly believe that Rogers Cable Systems is actively and purposely engaging in fraud to steal money from its customers in the form of bandwidth\u00a0(and likely also mobile-phone)\u00a0overage charges. Here are the facts.
\n
\nRogers provides a page on their site where you can view your \u201ccurrent\u201d bandwidth usage, however it is\u00a0never<\/strong> up-to-date and always at least a full day behind. Financial transactions are usually a day behind because they require a human to approve them. However bandwidth is nothing like that and can and\u00a0should<\/strong> be up-to-date down to the second (except perhaps for the bandwidth of the actual usage page itself). I do not believe this is a mistake or a technological limitation but rather done on purpose so that customers cannot know how much actual bandwidth they have used.
\n
\nRogers also provides a notification service which will insert a banner into web pages<\/a> to let you know that you have reached 75% or 100% of your monthly bandwidth. However just like the bandwidth usage page, this is\u00a0never<\/strong> up-to-date (in fact, they even admit in the banner that it detects the usage to within two days)<\/em>. You can easily sail well past the threshold and not receive the notifications until at least a full day later, thus rendering them\u00a0completely useless<\/strong>, even more so than the usage page since this is supposedly an\u00a0\u201calert\u201d. By having it be as behind as the usage page, it becomes completely useless and no more than a slightly more convenient way to access the usage page (though most people would argue with the term \u201cconvenient\u201d in regards to a banner inserted into all web pages\u2014some sites even detect the framing as a security risk). Again I believe this is done on purpose so that customers cannot know their actual current usage. In fact, the\u00a0\u201cnotifications\u201d are so much worse because they lull customers into a false sense of security, thinking that they will not go over because they will get an alert when they pass the two thresholds.
\n
\nOf course this is all only relevant when the MyRogers site actually works<\/em>, which seems to be rarely. Most of the time when you go to the MyRogers site to check your account status, bandwidth usage, etc., you are greeted with red text that says that they are having technical difficulties and\/or that they cannot retrieve your account information and to please try again later. It has been like this since they created the site about a decade ago. I\u2019m not convinced that it even truly is technical difficulties because it always seems to be worse towards the end (last week or so) of the billing cycle (on whatever day of the month that happens to fall for the account in question), when you are most likely to want to check how much bandwidth you have remaining.
\n
\nThe two mechanisms that Rogers provides\u00a0customers\u00a0to monitor their bandwidth usage are\u00a0both<\/strong> behind the actual usage by at least one full day (when they work at all). I strongly believe this is on purpose so that customers have no way to know what their precise usage is and worse, believe that they are safe. In this way, customers are more likely to go over their usage than if they are provided with correct numbers. This way, Rogers can charge them a lot more money per gigabyte they go over. Moreover, not only do they raise all of their prices for everything almost every single damned bloody month<\/em>, but they have also raised the fee for bandwidth overage, so they can gouge customers even more with this little scam of theirs.
\n
\nIt seems that since October 2012, the situation has gotten even worse! The stupid MyRogers website where you can check your bandwidth usage has stopped showing decimal places and rounds down<\/em><\/strong> to the nearest gigabyte, so you get even less<\/em> accurate information than even before, obviously in an attempt to trick people into going over their limit. This is almost certainly on purpose to push anyone who uses their allowance over the line so that they can charge them extra. Despicable behavior from a despicable company.
\n
\nWhat\u2019s even worse is that the different Internet service tiers they have provide overage charges in the\u00a0opposite way<\/em> of common sense. That is, the tier with the highest monthly bandwidth cap (currently 100GB\/month) has the lowest overage charge (currently 50\u00a2 per GB over) while the tier with the lowest cap (currently 15GB\/month) has the hight overage charge (currently $4 per GB over). (The interceding tiers follow suit.) This is absurd. If anything, the higher ones should be penalized more for using excess because they already have plenty of room, while the ones with the lower caps should have lower charges since they have such little to work with and are more likely to need to go over sometimes.
\n
\nUnfortunately customers cannot even just switch to a tier that fits their needs better because the tiers are so unevenly distributed. For example a lot of customers would find the second lowest (and least expensive) tier to be excessive. Not too many people need 12Mbps speed or 60GB per month. However the next lowest tier is only 3Mbps with a cap of 15GB per month. Why in the world is there not a tier in the middle that provides ~6Mbps with 30GB per month? Because then customers are force to either go down a level to one which is too tight and get nailed with $4\/GB over every month or go up a level to one that is too much for their needs and pay a higher monthly rate. Again, this is\u00a0not<\/strong> by accident. They do this on purpose in order to squeeze every last penny they can out of customers.
\n
\nThis is specifically about Rogers\u2019 Internet service, however because mobile phones are subject to bandwidth limits and overage charges,\u00a0I would not be surprised if it applied in exactly the same way to their wireless phone service as well.
\n
\nI wish I could say that this sort of behavior surprises me, but unfortunately I have come to expect very little from Rogers. This company has time and again proven itself to be a disgusting, money-grubbing, customer-abusing, greedy, manipulative, lying, fraudulent company. Customers should call them (1-888-Rogers1) and demand to talk to the highest level person that is available and demand that Rogers provide an up-to-the-second and kilo-byte accurate way for them to monitor their own Internet and mobile-phone usage. They should also demand more\u00a0appropriate\u00a0caps and overage charges and better tier distribution.
\n
\nAnother example of Rogers\u2019 ongoing deplorable behavior is their continuing throttling of customers\u2019 bandwidth despite being ordered to stop it almost two years ago<\/strong> by the CRTC, saying that they did stop, getting caught lying, saying they would stop, and yet continuing to do so. I am glad that Ted Rogers is dead and wish the same for the other executive rapists of that disgusting pile of garbage.
\n
\nMost people (rightly) complain that there should not be<\/em> a cap\/limit in the first place. They are correct because bandwidth is measured in BPS<\/acronym>. The \u201cseconds\u201d in BPS means that bandwidth is transient and therefore cannot be saved or hoarded for later. Either you use it or it is gone forever<\/strong>!\u00a0There is no sense is limiting people and wasting bandwidth. Unfortunately, ISPs are just like airlines; they overbook so that they don\u2019t waste their service, but end up overbooking over-zealously, and thus selling more than they have, so they have to limit everyone and then take advantage of that fact by charging more for better service.\n<\/div>\n
Dishonesty<\/a>, Fraud<\/a>, Money<\/a>, Rogers<\/a>, Unfairness<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I strongly believe that Rogers Cable Systems is actively and purposely engaging in fraud to steal money from its customers in the form of bandwidth\u00a0(and likely also mobile-phone)\u00a0overage charges. Here are the facts. Rogers provides a page on their site where you can view your \u201ccurrent\u201d bandwidth usage, however it is\u00a0never up-to-date and always at […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[53,47,49,46,48],"class_list":["post-159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-dishonesty","tag-fraud","tag-money","tag-rogers","tag-unfairness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/synetech.ddns.net\/blogs\/rantinions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}